Skip to main content

GuidelinesBy device type2026.09.29

Masks, Hand Disinfectants and Lens Solutions: Checking Korea’s Quasi-Drug Boundary

Similar product names can lead to different Korean regulatory routes. Use masks, hand disinfectants and contact-lens care products to build a classification dossier around intended use and the object being treated.

Describe the use before choosing a product name

When importing something described overseas as a medical mask, sanitizer or lens solution, establish its Korean regulatory route first. Translating its name and locating a similar term in the device list is insufficient for a borderline product. Before a purchase commitment or test order, write a paragraph explaining who uses it, on what, for what purpose and how.

The medical-device classification guide covers the broader starting point. This article focuses on evidence for products whose names overlap with quasi-drugs. Do not transfer a conclusion across a brand family when intended uses differ.

Identify the boundary in each product group

MFDS identifies surgical, health and droplet-blocking masks, certain disinfectants applied directly to the body such as hand disinfectants, and contact-lens cleaning and disinfection preparations as quasi-drugs. This does not mean every mask-shaped product or every cleaning liquid is outside the device route.

Sales description Actual use to establish Evidence to request
Mask Infection/particle barrier or connection to respiratory treatment equipment Wearing photographs, connections, intended use
Hand disinfectant Hand disinfection, washing or treatment of an object’s surface Full formula, claims, instructions
Lens solution Contact-lens care or cleaning other lenses/instruments Objects treated, use steps, limitations

This is a question list, not a classification table. Review the complete name, composition, mechanism and labeling before deciding which scope applies.

Separate products for hands from products for instruments

The same alcohol ingredient does not make a hand disinfectant equivalent to a cleansing product intended to remove dirt. Deleting a disinfecting claim while retaining the actual intended purpose is not a sufficient basis either. Product function and the effects communicated to customers need to align.

Ask the supplier for concentrations as well as ingredient names, product form, application site, contact time, rinsing instructions and restrictions. A preparation applied to a person and one used to process medical equipment may require different regulatory assessments. Do not reuse a conclusion for human application as the conclusion for instrument treatment.

Review contact-lens care sets component by component

A set may contain lenses, a case, cleaning or disinfecting preparations, and a cleaning device. Separate their functions and labeling first. A conclusion about a preparation cannot replace assessment of an electrical cleaner or another accessory. Obtain the manufacturer, model and supply route for each component.

For a lens preparation, identify whether it claims cleaning, rinsing, disinfection or preservation, and align the instructions with supporting evidence. If combining preparations or expanding compatible lens types, check whether existing authorization evidence covers that change. Overseas claims should not move directly into a Korean product listing.

Submit information that could change the classification

A reviewable information package is more useful than a single sales sheet. The following is a practical way to structure an inquiry.

  1. Identify the product and every component with photographs, models and manufacturers.
  2. Separate intended purpose, target, method of use and operating principle.
  3. Attach composition and concentrations, or materials and construction, plus original overseas instructions.
  4. Identify the proposed Korean label and advertising wording.
  5. Explain the difference between candidate categories and state the unresolved question.

Keep the response date and the version reviewed. When composition, intended purpose or set configuration changes, check whether the original assumptions still hold. A similar-product search result or a supplier’s certificate image cannot replace this assessment.

Connect the classification to contracts and labeling

For a product assessed as a quasi-drug, establish the relevant business and product authorization or notification route. For a device, establish the corresponding business and product procedures. Align report availability, label translation and distribution planning with that conclusion. Supply terms should identify documents the supplier will provide, change notifications and unresolved matters.

Advertising belongs in the same review. Check that proposed effects match the intended purpose, using the product-listing claims guide. Bring the product description, formula or construction information and proposed Korean claims to a classification review consultation; we can identify which boundary needs attention first.


Sources checked: 2026-09-28. The tables and preparation steps are practical suggestions; confirm the legal submission scope and applicable standards for the particular product.

Frequently asked questions

Q. Are all masks quasi-drugs in Korea?
MFDS lists surgical, health and droplet-blocking masks within the quasi-drug scope. That does not classify every cold-weather covering or interface connected to respiratory treatment equipment.
Q. Does an overseas device classification carry over to Korea?
It is supporting information. Korean review should compare the actual intended use, operating principle, quasi-drug designation and relevant product definitions.
Q. Can changing the name make a solution an ordinary consumer product?
The name alone does not decide the route. Composition, function, the object treated, instructions and advertising claims also need review.

Just send the product details.
We do the reviewing.

We pre-review device class, required pathway, and data readiness free of charge, and reply within 1 business day. No sign-up.